And another input from my side: it would also be good if we could see in the player statistics the Performence buzz points from the past few games. I think the best would be to show it in average. Because some players play more often then others. So i think that would be a great feature and makes it easier to monitor and analyse the past performence of each of this players.
This seems like an issue with the site? Shouldn't they retain some value? Shares dropping form a financial index still retain value. They only go to zero if the company goes under, which is like a player retiring. Players losing all their value in this way seems unfair & might alienate new users & harm the site long term. It's a great site nevertheless!
It keeps FI in the money and helps to fund stuff like triple MB or PB.
I've raised a query before after missing out on buzz payments for Lindelof despite him being in 3rd place. Luckily, I was brand new to FI then so only had small investment to feel the market place out.
Agree they need to work on the media buzz system. I've seen points assigned to Marcelo following a completely unrelated story mentioning someone by the same name.
Appreciate its difficult to automate positive/negative articles. Maybe all stories should be rated the same and then it becomes 'most stories win'.