@NeaviePops23 He's in the ''squad'' section, just named ''Wesley'' 76p

@LuaLua Sorry mate I don't have the exact dates but it wouldn't have been more than 6 months? I remember reacting slowly, IS at a loss on him and then ''a very short time later'' seeing a massive rise to find he was back as a defender again.

Regarding the changes I've look at the data for their PB scores and compared to other scores on that day, so Guedes as an example, I found 2 scores for him this season over 150pts both days he would not have won top forward (3rd on 1 and 5th on the other)

A lot of reaction to the positional changes and how it might affect dividend returns, so some quick research on players I've seen mentioned. (Of which I only own Hazard)

This is based on returns from this season and calculated using the post-split dividend structure;

Hazard - 21p as a FWD // 14p as a midfielder (Net change -7p / 33% PB yield)
Kimmich - 35p as a DEF // 12p as a midfielder (Net change -23p / 65% PB yield)
Guedes - 0p as a MID // 0p as a FWD
Players who would have benefitted most from Kimmich being a midfielder = no-one. His wins would have been spread across about 6 different defenders, all with 1 extra win (Sule (1 extra win) / Alaba? Unsure, one game Kimmich won with 134, I don't know who was 2nd as I don't record below 150)

Final thought for all those who've seen their investment crash and haven't sold, THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE, Marcelo of Real was also briefly a Midfielder, his price rebounded when OPTA (not FI!!!!) re-classified him back to a defender. Will Kimmich be re-classified as a defender, my feeling = yes. (I don't hold!!)

@NeaviePops23 Alexander- Arnold was someone I thought would make the IPD team, he had 16.5p, as previously mentioned it's a little misleading, there was a time when a defender goal was worth 3p and an assist at one point was 0.5p. So defenders who scored at ''the right time'' higher up the list. But he was the first name I checked!

Trent A-A - Media (0p) Performance (12p) IPD (16.5p) = 28.5p
Robertson - Media (0p) Performance (0p) IPD (9p)

@Valhalla - I have Shaw - Media (13p) Performance (2p) IPD (3p) = 18p total at todays. But yes 37p at the time - 33p in media, he was another that Mourinho loved to have a dig at. Also the ''I almost lost my leg'' interview was during triple media & when he was top 200 so great time for holders.

So a couple of notes on the above;

1. This is based on my own records dated 10th Aug - 16th May 2019, in the words of Rag N Bone Man ''I'm only human'' but should be very accurate.
   If anyone thinks I've missed someone then please let me know and I'll check my records.
2. I've cheated on initial request (4-4-2) and I've gone for a (3-4-3) as higher returns are mostly with forwards (not necessarily higher %s though)
3. Returns are based on what they would be worth at post-split values, except for IPDs which are the totals to date. It's obvious but worth stating you wouldn't have qualified for all IPDs without selling every month and paying a 2% commission so it's slightly misleading.

@Andy-M Yes. (Based on the Porto -v- Roma game)

This topic stinks of fear-mongering.

It's a head injury end of story, move on!!

End of season injury, what 1 more league game and 1 CL game?! (Sorry Reds not optimistic you can turn it around!!)

@NewUser202451 I'm in the UK so definitely not a 100% answer but Just did a quick Google, the Swift is also known as your BIC number - from what I can see Canadian banks should have this.....

Also Tuesday, Montpelier home to PSG, along with Tottenham -v- Ajax the only eligible games for triple PB.

@NewUser142017 Youngest wins so actually Alena should be number 1 :-)