Update for the 1st Nov is already done. I'll copy and paste it in on the day. So no delay til I have the time to update the post like last time.

I think we have a general consensus. We're all broke

I spent what I was planning already. Got a couple of thousand I could drop right in if I feel like it's warranted, but I've also got over £1000 coming from the bonus pay out to use soon. So i'll just play it by ear after 6.00.

How many people have already spent the money they put aside for this announcement, trying to second guess FI or are you saving your funds til you know the new state of play?

@Gazz127 They have been kicking around with this idea for few years now. Seems like a good idea in general. Geographically it would work fine. Only problem I can see is the new super league would be commercially better for those in it, with two countries watching one league, however half the teams will now they are very likely to end up in the new second tier and that would almost most certainly be worst for them commercially.

@NallyCat No. Fully locked out of any trading. Then once the website comes back up it's unusable for about 2 hours lol. I brought 4k of the same players last time because the website was so fucked, was meant to be 1k, woops

@kristiang85 I'm very much for this, buying dividends and fastest fingers first doesn't really work for me.

@Black-wolf Would it though? It would add a bigger underlying value to every share, much like IPDs did. IPDs are valid for 30 days, just like this idea is only valid for 30 days. So I can't see why the pattern would change. If a player scores over 200+ people buy on massive for the dividends as there is no 2pm cut off, then next week if the same player fails to score 200+ he is dumped on massive, to pile in on the other players about to win dividends that day. Just like with the goals and assists making the market more volatile, this seems to very much the same idea with just a different win mechanism to get the dividends.

I agree it will add more weight to the PB system, but I don't think it would fix the issue of crazy movements. Which is something I want to see calm down.

The only thing I can think that would skew the results would be that most people that will do it. Are the users that engage the most with the platform, and these users are more likely to have the best understanding of how everything works. So FI would get a false reading that people in general are understanding the platform more than they really are.

@ocs123 What he do?