@NewUser416079 can’t see him going anywhere pal, the dons would crumble without him. Not that I’d complain, but they need some solidity and he’s it

Agreed! Invested after seeing him on opening day and was impressed with him against Liverpool tonight. Glad he didn’t play better though, YNWA!

Another spread inconsistancy to hit everyone with. Prior to tonight’s champions league qualifiers I purchased 125 shares in Marcus berg at 19p. As soon as I purchased my shares, the spread jumped from 1p to 3p 😡😡 how the hell they can justify a 20% spread on a 19p player, when I’m the only one that’s bought shares in him to my knowledge as the price % didn’t rise before kick off after I bought him I don’t know. It’s things like this that make me want to back out of FI, as it’s impossible for anyone with a small cash flow to build their protfolio to make any kind of money worth withdrawing at all. Discuss

Another example, I bought Marcus Berg (FK Krasnodar) before tonight’s champions league qualifying started. As soon as I bought my shares (only 125 I might add) his spread went from 1p to 3p 😡 as his price % increase didn’t rise at all before the game started other than when I purchased my shares, I’m failing to understand the logic!! Makes me want to pull out of FI, it’s because of things like this that nobody with limited money can make a decent return on a player and use the profits to build their portfolio.

Marcus Rashford - proven in the prem and scores goals and provides them, will get a lot of game time this season. 22p spread which seems a bit much for me.

Now you’ve got Daniel James 😒 - signs for Utd from Swansea, come the start of the season and he has a 21p spread. Absolutely ridiculous, whether he has scored his first Utd goal or not is irrelevant. That spread for someone’s PL debut is an absolute joke.

Bought 50 shares earlier today at 30p each and his value has since risen to 32p a share. But my portfolio is showing -6p per share, way too many glitches in FI for a real money system. Enough so that I’m thinking of getting out soon

@Metropolis I’d limit the outlets, by far the easiest way to do it! The amount of crap that gets filtered through and counts as news/headlines is ridiculous. True that we would have problems with traores/smiths but if another neymar comes along before our current one retires I bet they’ll change the system for that since he’s a big hitter. But as FI only has one Tierney in their system I think it’s shit that the mb doesn’t get applied to him. And reducing the amount of media outlets which qualify would also make it very easy for one man to filter all the new stories as they’re released. Just my suggestion though

@MickTurbo and this doesn’t seem shit to anyone else?

@MickTurbo his name is in the headline 😔

@MickTurbo agreed and I have zero issues with neymar receiving his MB, but Kieran Tierney has his own paragraph in the article in which his names mentioned several times yet on the leaderboard he has no sky sports news stories reported about him today. System is a shambles and needs sorted, I wouldn’t mind if it was for fun but we invest our hard earned money into this to try and win some extra spends