Whilst some of your points are fair, FI gave almost 6 months notice that MB was opening up to the squad which is more than they gave for the share split!
Yes, that's true. But FI also said that MB was only likely to be won by squad players 7% of the time, which is BS (so far).
Everyone needs to chill ....
Not my words, but the words of the CEO
To be fair to them, the figures seem to stack up (although in the bottom section they seem to have a few errouneous entries unless im reading it wrong - ie Mbappe not being a top 200 players when winning an MB dividend ??!?)
I watched the Armenia game and he was class that night.. think he might of had a goal(or two) taken away from him too?
He's certainly Mancini's chosen no9 right now and if he keeps scoring he'll certainly be in the Euros squad... I've held him in the past, don't hold right now but wouldn't bat an eyelid investing now at his current price...
My only worry is that he does rely on goals to hold his value so any dry patch and his price will fall... Also i still have very very very bad memories of Andrea Silenzi many years ago who came to Forest from Torino as a previous hot shot goalscorer in Serie A but it was soon apparent he couldn't hit a cows backside with a banjo!!!!
MB: Rashford finally gets a goal in open play, albeit one that should have been disallowed by the impotent VAR, against Liverpool to earn United a point to take them to 13th in the table. No further comments.
@Alpilgrim another thing is fi won't give two shits cos they are making out of it also. But in the long run it could discourage people that are just starting out so also a negative for fi.
They need to give 2 shits cos stuff like this looks suspiciously like money laundering. If not then its a group acting together to manipulate the market which is against their own ts and cs. If they don't get their act together on things like this sooner or later they'll end up under investigation.
@ScouseSte but as you say capital appreciation can be hugely lead by dividends... so worth noting whilst many buy for one or the other... some actually buy on the basis that they are both linked!!!!
This is my method. I have dividend earners or ones that are highly likely to become dividend earners. If im buying a plyer who isnt proven i alwys ask myself “can i see him being in the media much in the future”. Predicting PB earners is much harder so i only buy proven PB players
@ScouseSte loves a name and shame. Makes him feel better about being a complete wasteman.
The names are not real names on the ticker so it's irrelevant. You can make that display name anything you want.
No sensitive information was released. Nobody was harmed during the production of this thread (which turned out to be very enlightening, for me as well as others)
But thank you for your invaluable contribution here and I look forward to more of your in-depth, enthralling comments on other forum posts 👍